This journal employs a blind peer review model. The primary objective of peer review is to furnish the Editor with pertinent information necessary for reaching a fair, evidence-based decision aligned with the journal's editorial standards. Review reports should also assist authors in revising their paper to meet publication criteria.

Editors are responsible for independently verifying the contact details of reviewers recommended by authors or third parties. Whenever feasible, institutional email addresses should be utilized to invite peer reviewers. Furthermore, each manuscript should undergo review by at least one reviewer who was not suggested by the author.

Reviewers are expected to articulate their opinions clearly, supported by arguments and references. They should maintain confidentiality regarding materials provided and refrain from discussing unpublished manuscripts with colleagues or utilizing such information in their own work.