This publication uses a blind peer review process. Peer review's main goal is to give the editor the knowledge they need to make an impartial, fact-based conclusion that complies with the journal's editorial standards. Review reports ought to assist writers in making necessary revisions to their work so that it could be approved for publication.

It is expected of editors to independently confirm the contact information provided by authors or other third parties for reviewers. Peer reviewers should be invited using institutional email addresses whenever feasible. At least one reviewer who was not recommended by the author should read each paper.

Reviewers should clearly state their opinions and provide sources and reasons to back them up.

Reviewers must to keep the information they receive confidential and refrain from discussing unpublished manuscripts.